­MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES­

 

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENT

 

Department: Collection Management

Subject: “General History”

Fund codes: “his,” other

Written by: Michael E. Unsworth

Date Drafted: May 16, 2006

Date Revised:

 

I. PURPOSE OR SCOPE OF COLLECTION.

 

A. Curricular/Research/Programmatic needs

 

Resources in “General” History serve the instructional and research needs of the undergraduate and graduate programs in the Department of History as well as those in other units, namely English, Political Science, James Madison, Sociology, Integrative Studies, etc. The collection also supports graduate and faculty research in primarily in History, Political Science, and International Development. The collection also serves the general information and interest needs of the University community.

 

B. History of the Collection/Existing strengths and emphases.

 

It is hard to see this entire category as a coherent collection. It can best be regarded as a smattering of areas and interests. For the most part, it fills in for aspects of history that are not covered by other selectors or straddle disciplines.

 

Two Library of Congress classification schemes catch many works: "C"  (Auxiliary Sciences of History) and parts of  “D” (History (General)). Otherwise, works can classify anywhere.

 

“C” classification is a hodge-podge of materials that cover Civilization, General Archaeology, Archives and Manuscripts, Numismatics, Genealogy, and Biography. To talk of strength for this classification is misleading; its materials support other activities in academic research, especially the humanities. Oftentimes, materials ordered from other funds land here due to the whims of the LC classifiers. Strengths and emphasis in specific areas are best covered in IV.

 

Strengths in the areas of the “D” classification are Historiography, the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries (especially the World Wars and Cold War).  The language is predominantly English.

 

 

II. FACTORS INFLUENCING COLLECTION POLICY.

 

A. Anticipated future trends

 

“C”  -- Hard to nail down. Some materials will arrive in this area as ordered by various selectors.

“D” -- There will be continued strong research and instructional interest in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries.

 

B. Relationships with other resources

 

1. On campus branch or format collections, if any

 

There are so many possible relationships with branches and other format collections as to render a listing to be meaningless.  .

 

2. Regional or network resources, if any

 

While the murkiness of this category makes identifying outside resources as being tricky, some overarching observations can be made. MSUL’s memberships in  consortia and cooperatives such as the Michigan Electronic Library and the Center for Research Libraries do provide cost-effective means of access to materials that are out of this collection policy statement. Equally important is our joint catalog with the Library of Michigan. Its holdings of genealogical materials greatly expands the horizons of our users.

 

   C. Relationships to resources treated in other policy statements:

 


African American Studies

Africana

American History

American Radicalism

Anthropology

Asian Pacific American Studies

Asian Studies

British History

Canadian Studies

Chicano Latino Studies

Classical Studies

European Studies

French Studies 

German Studies

International Development

Jewish Studies

Latin American & Caribbean Studies

Medieval History

Military And Naval Sciences

Native American Studies

Political Science

Religious Studies

Russel B. Nye Popular Culture Collection

Russia/Eastern Europe/Central

U.S. Documents

Women and Gender Studies


 

III. ANALYSIS OF THE SUBJECT FIELD

 

A.   Chronology of the subject: emphases/restrictions:

 

“C” -- Not Applicable

“D” – Conforms to classification table.

 

B. Languages of resources collected: exclusions/emphases/translations

 

Primarily English with inclusion of works in the major Western languages as well as works in the vernacular as applicable.

 

C. Geography of the subject: emphases/restrictions --Not Applicable

 

D. Format of the resources collected: restrictions if any -- Primarily print.

 

E. Date of publication of resources collected --Not Applicable

 

IV. LEVELS OF COLLECTING INTENSITY

 

Call # Ranges

Subject

Level

C

Auxiliary Sciences of History (General)

3

CB

Civilization

4

CC

Archaeology (General)

3b

CD 1-899

Diplomatics

2

CD 900-4999

Archives

3b

CD 5000-6500

Seals

1

CE

Technical Chronology

1

CJ

Numismatics

1

CN

Inscriptions

1

CR

Heraldry

1

CS

Genealogy

2

CT

Biography

3b

D 1-12

History (General)

3b

D 13-16

Historiography

3b

D 17-24

World Histories

3b

D 25-27

Military & Naval History

3a

D 204 -

Modern History, 1453-

--

D 204-219

General works

3a

D 220-241

1453-1648

2

D 242-250

1601-1715. 17th century

2

D 251-272

Thirty Years War, 1618-1648

2

D 273-283

1648-1715

2

D 284-350

1715-1789. 18th century

4

D 351-409

19th century. 1801-1914/20

4

D 410-500

20th century

4

D 501-719

First World War (1914-1918)

4

D 720-730

Inter-War Period (1919-1939)

4

D 731-823

Second World War (1939-1945)

4

D 824-838

Reconstruction

3a

D 839-860

Post-war history (1945-)

4

 

 

V. COLLECTION MANAGEMENT ISSUES.

 

   General interest materials, which are not related to research needs, are not preserved, but withdrawn when used up or outdated.

Electronic products offering broad coverage will demand careful analysis.